Rule proposal 35
+3
Pentadragon
chenhsi
animorpherv1
7 posters
Page 1 of 1
Rule proposal 35
Nomia is in a crisis (as mentioned in prop. 30), we have no food (dealt with by Mokina), and nothing to wear, among other things. On the passing of the proposal, we would start trade with some small countries, trading our food with the things they don't need. Essentially, it's a way to get our Economy boosted, while making more jobs, and Nomia gets the basic essentials it needs.
Every month (open too things such as once every two months), a specified player (given the job of Trade with multiple countries), would post a how much food was given away, and how much of everything was imported.
Shall we get in critical condition with our food, we will stop trading, untill we get a good amount of food.
Every month (open too things such as once every two months), a specified player (given the job of Trade with multiple countries), would post a how much food was given away, and how much of everything was imported.
Shall we get in critical condition with our food, we will stop trading, untill we get a good amount of food.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
We have no food and we are trading away food?
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule proposal 35
chenhsi wrote:We have no food and we are trading away food?
We can just pack the crates full of dirt and hope they won't notice.
Pentadragon- Activist
- Posts : 84
Join date : 2008-11-10
Re: Rule proposal 35
Right now, we would be in critical condition, so there would be no trade, however, when we have more than enough food, we would start trading.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
Who are these small countries and why would they want to trade with us?
HPew- Citizen
- Posts : 15
Join date : 2008-11-16
Re: Rule proposal 35
That matters?
I was thkinging small European countries, but I really don't care, that can get amended.
I was thkinging small European countries, but I really don't care, that can get amended.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
animorpherv1 wrote:That matters?
I was thkinging small European countries, but I really don't care, that can get amended.
I myself think it matters somewhat. Does Europe even exist in this universe?
Pentadragon- Activist
- Posts : 84
Join date : 2008-11-10
Re: Rule proposal 35
Who's to say it doesn't? We never really said anything about that. I'd say Nomia is just a very small town in a somewhere.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
This seems like a vague idea, Maybe try to get it fine tuned in the brainstorming area?
pyrodwarf- Activist
- Posts : 74
Join date : 2008-11-07
Age : 38
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule proposal 35
Then amend it afterwards? Yes, this was meant to be a diamond in the roigh, where people could share tehir ideas and change it.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
Too confusing, really general, so vote: no for now
Maybe if the idea is fine-tuned, yes.
Maybe if the idea is fine-tuned, yes.
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule proposal 35
Vote: No
I might also vote yes if the proposal was "fine-tuned".
I might also vote yes if the proposal was "fine-tuned".
Pentadragon- Activist
- Posts : 84
Join date : 2008-11-10
Re: Rule proposal 35
Any ideas for the fine tuning, I'll do in an amendment.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
Needs some kind of guidelines as to how much food is considerd surplus, and thus allowed for trade.
What exactly are we trading for?
By what prosess shall we nominate/elect the village trade person?(needs a cooler title)
What exactly are we trading for?
By what prosess shall we nominate/elect the village trade person?(needs a cooler title)
pyrodwarf- Activist
- Posts : 74
Join date : 2008-11-07
Age : 38
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule proposal 35
pyrodwarf wrote:Needs some kind of guidelines as to how much food is considerd surplus, and thus allowed for trade.
What exactly are we trading for?
By what prosess shall we nominate/elect the village trade person?(needs a cooler title)
I'd say, for flavour only, 1 Farm would feed about 20 people. , I'd say that 20 people need 1 Farm, so you'd need double the amount of farms needed to feed everybody,
For example:
There is 18 people palaying here, and 2 farms (for example reasons). Farm 1 would feed everybody, and leftovers on that farm would be saved for harsh times. Farm 2 would go to trade.
We are trading for things that people need to have a comfortable life.
After the proposal passed, there would be a 36 hours for nomination, and when all nominees were in place, then 36 hours for voting. Whoever had the most votes would be considered "Trade Leader".
Cooler title may be necessary.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
Vote: No for now, but I'd like to see trade in the future.
Mokina- Cartographer
- Posts : 124
Join date : 2008-11-07
Re: Rule proposal 35
I feel useless.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
This should have been placed in the Brainstorming subforum to be discussed. All you've managed to do here is cost yourself one point by posting a clearly half-baked idea as a full proposition.animorpherv1 wrote:pyrodwarf wrote:Needs some kind of guidelines as to how much food is considerd surplus, and thus allowed for trade.
What exactly are we trading for?
By what prosess shall we nominate/elect the village trade person?(needs a cooler title)
I'd say, for flavour only, 1 Farm would feed about 20 people. , I'd say that 20 people need 1 Farm, so you'd need double the amount of farms needed to feed everybody,
For example:
There is 18 people palaying here, and 2 farms (for example reasons). Farm 1 would feed everybody, and leftovers on that farm would be saved for harsh times. Farm 2 would go to trade.
We are trading for things that people need to have a comfortable life.
After the proposal passed, there would be a 36 hours for nomination, and when all nominees were in place, then 36 hours for voting. Whoever had the most votes would be considered "Trade Leader".
Cooler title may be necessary.
But, you're not useless. You just made a mistake. You're not the only one.
Cybele- Council Member
- Posts : 114
Join date : 2008-11-04
Re: Rule proposal 35
Cybele wrote:This should have been placed in the Brainstorming subforum to be discussed. All you've managed to do here is cost yourself one point by posting a clearly half-baked idea as a full proposition.animorpherv1 wrote:pyrodwarf wrote:Needs some kind of guidelines as to how much food is considerd surplus, and thus allowed for trade.
What exactly are we trading for?
By what prosess shall we nominate/elect the village trade person?(needs a cooler title)
I'd say, for flavour only, 1 Farm would feed about 20 people. , I'd say that 20 people need 1 Farm, so you'd need double the amount of farms needed to feed everybody,
For example:
There is 18 people palaying here, and 2 farms (for example reasons). Farm 1 would feed everybody, and leftovers on that farm would be saved for harsh times. Farm 2 would go to trade.
We are trading for things that people need to have a comfortable life.
After the proposal passed, there would be a 36 hours for nomination, and when all nominees were in place, then 36 hours for voting. Whoever had the most votes would be considered "Trade Leader".
Cooler title may be necessary.
But, you're not useless. You just made a mistake. You're not the only one.
Every proposal I've made has been trashed.
The store one we could have saved and just not used, untill we had the resources.
This one is going to fail altough we can save it by amending it.
The other 2 I made failed for some other reasons.
I'm starting to feel like I'm not needed around here anymore.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
Well, I haven't had a single proposition pass either, besides, you have decent ideas. The store has been adapted by Mokina and is well on its way to passing. Just because your idea needs a little smoothing over doesn't mean it's useless, or that you are.
Remember to make liberal use of the Brainstorming subforum. That's what it's there for.
Remember to make liberal use of the Brainstorming subforum. That's what it's there for.
Cybele- Council Member
- Posts : 114
Join date : 2008-11-04
Re: Rule proposal 35
Cybele wrote:Well, I haven't had a single proposition pass either, besides, you have decent ideas. The store has been adapted by Mokina and is well on its way to passing. Just because your idea needs a little smoothing over doesn't mean it's useless, or that you are.
Remember to make liberal use of the Brainstorming subforum. That's what it's there for.
Maybe I should have used, but I always get the idea, and it sounds great in my head, and I can make sense of it. I get the idea when it's only half explained.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule proposal 35
Def. not useless. Like cybele suggested, make use of the brainstorming forum. This is a good start, but what are we trading for? Resources? Coins for the village vault?
pyrodwarf- Activist
- Posts : 74
Join date : 2008-11-07
Age : 38
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule proposal 35
This proposal has failed 1 to 3.
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Similar topics
» Rule proposal 9: Player proposal limit (FAILED)
» Rule Proposal 27
» Rule Proposal 21: Value of Votes
» Rule Proposal 14 (PASSED)
» Rule Proposal 32: Coins
» Rule Proposal 27
» Rule Proposal 21: Value of Votes
» Rule Proposal 14 (PASSED)
» Rule Proposal 32: Coins
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|