Rule Proposals 28
+4
Pentadragon
Cybele
chenhsi
animorpherv1
8 posters
Page 1 of 1
Rule Proposals 28
animorpherv1 Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:03 pm
On the passing of this proposition, a new Sub Forum would be made, called "Moderator nominations". In this subforum, people would nominate who they they should be a moderator, along with skitzer, and any outstanding moderators.
To be moderator:
1. Must have at least 100 posts.
2. Must be nominated
3. Must be seconded by someone else.
4. skitzer must agree.
To be moderator:
1. Must have at least 100 posts.
2. Must be nominated
3. Must be seconded by someone else.
4. skitzer must agree.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Cybele- Council Member
- Posts : 114
Join date : 2008-11-04
Re: Rule Proposals 28
chenhsi Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:08 pm
Cybele, why do you have your online status hidden?
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Cybele Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:10 pm
I'm clearly a thief in the night/snake in the grass, don'tcha know.
Cybele- Council Member
- Posts : 114
Join date : 2008-11-04
Re: Rule Proposals 28
chenhsi Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:11 pm
I noticed because your name, and only your name, disappeared when I sorted all players by Last Visit time 
And I would see a "hidden" player whenever you were around.
And I would see a "hidden" player whenever you were around.
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule Proposals 28
chenhsi Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:33 pm
2 Notes:
1: This will eventually lead to everyone meeting the first requirement. Perhaps gradually increasing the number of needed posts?
2: This might cause some spamming, to get to the post requirement.
1: This will eventually lead to everyone meeting the first requirement. Perhaps gradually increasing the number of needed posts?
2: This might cause some spamming, to get to the post requirement.
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Cybele Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:47 pm
Instead of an 'overall post count' requirement, how about a 'weekly post count' requirement that could be calculated with the total posts that person's made and how long they've been members. Something like "In order to qualify for Moderator duty, a player must maintain at least 10 posts/week."
Cybele- Council Member
- Posts : 114
Join date : 2008-11-04
Re: Rule Proposals 28
chenhsi Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:49 pm
I've been on here for 10 days and I have 89 posts...
How about 40 posts / week?
And there still might be spamming?
How about 40 posts / week?
And there still might be spamming?
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Pentadragon Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:51 pm
Wouldn't the current proposal encourage spamming? I would support a smiple nomination and voting of Moderators rather than this.
Vote: No
Vote: No
Pentadragon- Activist
- Posts : 84
Join date : 2008-11-10
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Mokina Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:53 pm
chenhsi wrote:1: This will eventually lead to everyone meeting the first requirement. Perhaps gradually increasing the number of needed posts?
I feel like as long as there's an election-based policy for removing inactive moderators, we'll be fine. People aren't going to nominate and vote for people who aren't actually active players.
I agree with Pentadragon on the spam thing, too.
Mokina- Cartographer
- Posts : 124
Join date : 2008-11-07
Re: Rule Proposals 28
chenhsi Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:00 pm
Well, if someone spammed, we could impeach (which could be another proposal) them or skitzer would kick them off, or not let them to be a moderator in the first place.
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Cybele Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:02 pm
That's true.
However, I think Mokina and Penta are correct that all we need is the nomination and vote to make a mod (and skitzer's agreement, of course).
However, I think Mokina and Penta are correct that all we need is the nomination and vote to make a mod (and skitzer's agreement, of course).
Cybele- Council Member
- Posts : 114
Join date : 2008-11-04
Re: Rule Proposals 28
UltimaAvalon Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:05 am
Vote: No
Who cares about spamming?
I dont think there should be a post requirement for mod, as moderators are charged with the duty of website upkeep, which doesnt matter as far as Nomic is concerned
As such, I believe Moderators should be assigned by current Moderators, regardless of the will of the players
Who cares about spamming?
I dont think there should be a post requirement for mod, as moderators are charged with the duty of website upkeep, which doesnt matter as far as Nomic is concerned
As such, I believe Moderators should be assigned by current Moderators, regardless of the will of the players
UltimaAvalon- Citizen
- Posts : 30
Join date : 2008-11-10
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Snix Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:43 am
Vote no
The post requirement should go. It'd lead to too many problems without any pay out.
The post requirement should go. It'd lead to too many problems without any pay out.
Snix- Housing Director
- Posts : 55
Join date : 2008-11-05
pyrodwarf- Activist
- Posts : 74
Join date : 2008-11-07
Age : 38
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Mokina Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:25 am
Listen... if we need another mod, skitzer will be the first to know. He will then put forth several proposals, each with a prospective mod that he can live with. The community votes on them, and whoever receives the most votes becomes a moderator.
We can handle this informally; I don't see the need for a system at the moment.
Vote: No
We can handle this informally; I don't see the need for a system at the moment.
Vote: No
Mokina- Cartographer
- Posts : 124
Join date : 2008-11-07
Re: Rule Proposals 28
UltimaAvalon Sat Nov 15, 2008 11:20 am
Addendum to what I was saying earlier
Mods assign Mods. The will of the people has no say in issues of site upkeep, as it has nothing to do with the game itself. The end.
God: All right guys, Its gotten a bit difficult maintaining the world, so I'm going to need one of you to help me
People: Thats all right God. Here, We voted Bam to be Co-God with you.
God: ...Bam? No no no, I was gonna make UA Co-God.
People: Well, we think Bam is an excellent person and contributes excellent things and we think he should be distinguished with God-hood
God: But he's technologically incompetent, and there's reports of him being the Nomian Prostitute. UA has a whole resume page dedicated to places he's been God of, and is most definatly NOT the Nomian prostitute. UA is Co-God
People: REBEL!
Mods assign Mods. The will of the people has no say in issues of site upkeep, as it has nothing to do with the game itself. The end.
UltimaAvalon- Citizen
- Posts : 30
Join date : 2008-11-10
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Mokina Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:53 pm
UltimaAvalon wrote:Mods assign Mods. The will of the people has no say in issues of site upkeep, as it has nothing to do with the game itself. The end.
Neh, fair enough.
Mokina- Cartographer
- Posts : 124
Join date : 2008-11-07
Re: Rule Proposals 28
animorpherv1 Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:28 pm
People are focusing way too much on the 100 posts things. like Mokina said, people won't get nominated if they spam. Also, skitzer would have to agree, so if he didn't want to have more mods, he could just say "not right now".
Maybe a 1 nomination per player might help, too.
I'm all for an ammendment, too.
Maybe a 1 nomination per player might help, too.
I'm all for an ammendment, too.
animorpherv1- Council Member
- Posts : 111
Join date : 2008-11-04
Age : 29
Location : Right here
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Cybele Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:23 pm
No, I think UA's nailed it on the head. We simply don't need this proposition (and more importantly, neither does skitzer), so this is just going to get in the way when the time comes to select an auxiliary mod.
Cybele- Council Member
- Posts : 114
Join date : 2008-11-04
Change Vote to NAY
Cybele- Council Member
- Posts : 114
Join date : 2008-11-04
Re: Rule Proposals 28
Mokina Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:01 pm
Cybele wrote:No, I think UA's nailed it on the head. We simply don't need this proposition (and more importantly, neither does skitzer), so this is just going to get in the way when the time comes to select an auxiliary mod.
I agree with Cybele and UA.
Mokina- Cartographer
- Posts : 124
Join date : 2008-11-07
chenhsi- Committee Chair
- Posts : 161
Join date : 2008-11-04
Location : CA, USA
Similar topics» Current Rule Proposals
» Rule Proposition 22
» Current Abolishment Proposals
» Rule Proposal 27
» Rule proposal 35
» Rule Proposition 22
» Current Abolishment Proposals
» Rule Proposal 27
» Rule proposal 35
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|